P Floding;153654 Wrote: 
> What a load of absurd nonsense!
> Why shouldn't it be possible to improve on the SB? Do you really
> believe the Transporter to be so different? And, if so, in what way
> would this difference make such a difference to the sound?
> Also, the Benchmark isn't jitter "rejecting". That's just hype.

Which part, exactly, is the load of absurd nonsense?  Is it the part
about how the company which built the SB might have an advantage when
it comes to improving it?  Especially given a budget of $2000, tons of
time, a new architecture, sophisticated measuring tools, etc. etc.?  Or
is it the part where I said it's harder to believe that two transports
connected to a DAC which is hyped for its jitter immunity would sound
different then to believe that two analogue sources with very different
internals would?

I don't know what's inside the Benchmark - but it's certainly NOT
implausible to say a DAC can be jitter rejecting or even immune.  If
you think it's hype, why don't you back that up with some facts rather
than simply making rude assertions?

Patrick Dixon Wrote: 
> 
> Depends what you call 'a few swapped parts'. We disconnect all the
> SB2/3 analogue circuitry and fit our own pcbs and power supply etc etc.
> Not all mods are the same, but honestly, life's too short ...

Too short for a five minute blind test?  How much time have you spent
listening to your SB+?  Far more than that, I should hope.  And if the
mod is digital only then I _really_ don't see the point without some
convincing demonstration that it actually sounds better when connected
to a good DAC.

ezkcdude Wrote: 
> 
> No, no, no. That is not true either.
Can you comment on why?  I would say the following is a proof of
principle - simply record the entire audio stream you're interested in
in a big buffer, and then clock it out using a local clock.  Not very
convenient, since you have to wait a long time before you hear
anything, but absolutely zero sensitivity to the input's jitter.  Lavry
seems to be a clever version of that idea.


-- 
opaqueice
------------------------------------------------------------------------
opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29450

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to