highdudgeon wrote: > Patrick Dixon;162604 Wrote: >> I think you should definitely put that at the top of every post >> where you say that there is no (or an insignificant) difference >> between transports and DACs! >> >> It just goes to show how differently people listen to and hear >> music, and how unwise it is (IMO) to take advice from people re >> sound quality on internet fora. > >
> Patrick, > > 1. That's just plain weird, but I know you don't like me, that you > resentment for whatever silly reason, and that you find that it makes > you feel good to flame me from time to time. I have over 300gb in > Apple Lossless. Apple Lossless is not a bad thing. It is, well, > lossless. It is -- really -- as good as anything else. However, I > am sure that, with fairy dust and a few incantations, you can make > far superior scans. I'm also sure you've taken great measures to > correct you room and system. > > 2. No one has to take my advice on a damned thing and I'm certainly > to last to insist on it. If you don't like what I have to say (which > includes the obversation that the Transporter looks a lot better than > your gadget) then bloody well ignore it. Get it? Ignore it. I > know some people find that hard to do...but it is worth a try. > Certainly more worthwhile than turning a sort-of interesting advice > and recommendation thread and turning it into a mudslinging zone. > You're just a great chap. <sigh> Remember this post [1]? You over-reacted then too. It's déja vu all over again. R. [1] http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29875 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
