Triode;175847 Wrote: > SB3 will be a good demo, but only because it has a reasonable amount of > buffering and hence you will get good performance.. Its designed to > cater for Wifi dropouts so a 50ms protection switch is nothing for it. > Data is transfered from the server to player using a tcp connection and > then dumped into the internal buffer. > > Better demo would be the old SB1 streaming WAV as that only had 0.5 sec > of buffer.
I agree except I am trying to demo the Fast Reroute Capabilities of our network equipment, not the buffering capability of the SB. Our equipment can protect and reroute around failures in about 50 m/s. If the end device (i.e SB) is buffering 500 m/s of content, I am not proving much. Anyone have any idea on the buffering capabilities of softsqueeze? -- sfraser ------------------------------------------------------------------------ sfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2026 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32248 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
