occam;178202 Wrote: > Perhaps the well reasoned and plausable conclusion from this > non-empirical thought experinment is not entirely correct...... > > I find the following link particulary interesting as an adjunct when > reading this forum - > http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html
There should be a special line in that page for people who make the following argument: I think you are wrong: furthermore, I'm going to make an implicit claim that you are committing a fallacious argument of known type, as listed on this page, but I won't tell you which. Aside from having no validity as an argument itself, the implicit "you're dishonest/stupid" component is fairly uncivil. So I'll reply in kind: the "argument" you just made can fairly charitably be called bullshit. -- totoro squeezebox 3 -> mccormack dna .5 -> audio physic tempo 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ totoro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5935 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32231 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
