totoro;180605 Wrote: > That wasn't quite what I was getting at. You start off with your priors, > do some tests, which will change a bunch of probabilities (since many of > the priors you assigned will be conditional, either directly or > transitively, on the values which were changed by doing the test). > Presto change-o, new probability/plausibility assessments. No appeal to > authority is necessary here. > > The only thing to argue about is the priors: I suppose that is actually > perhaps a big thing :).
You make it sound so simple! ;-) -- P Floding No, I didn't ABX it. And I won't even if you ask me. (Especially not if you ask me.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32352 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
