Phil Leigh;182539 Wrote: > Quite right - it doesn't. 88.2 - 44.1 simply means throwing away every > alternate sample. There is NO need for any intelligence or maths here! > > 96 - 44.1 is more of an art since there are decisions to be made...
Interesting. I take it that there are more approaches to 96 -> 44.1 than simply throwing away 519 of every 960 samples in as "non-adjacent" manner as possible, yes? Perhaps some type of algorithm that "smooths" transitions? I really know very little about this domain. -- jeffmeh ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jeffmeh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3986 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32958 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
