You are right. Most mods on a vintage Mustang would cost far more than the modest original MSRP of the car.
In the case of the SB, it makes more sense to tweak this platform instead of the TP. Pat Farrell;193463 Wrote: > crooner wrote: > > This also needs to be cost effective, because otherwise I would > simply > > shell out the 2 grand and buy the Transporter... > > No, it does not need to be cost effective, this is the audiophiles > list > > > It is interesting to look at the progression of other hobbies. In the > late 50s, if you wanted a high performance car, you built it. in the > late 60s, you bought a GTO, Mustang, etc. then in the late 70s, smog > rules sucked the life out of cars, and the home-built hot rods came > back. Some parts of the car hobby just baffle me, sure the hotrod > Hondas > and other front wheel drive cars are fast, but a ten year old Mustang > with just a little tweaking is just as fast for lots less money. So > clearly some of it is just for the hell of doing something weird. > > > > -- > Pat > http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html -- crooner SB3 with Custom Linear Power Supply Lite Audio DAC-60 Tube DAC VPI Scout with Benz Micro Glider M2 Audio Research PH3, SP16L and VS110 Vandersteen 2Ce signatures, 2W subwoofer. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ crooner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3379 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34291 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
