CatBus;194734 Wrote: > No need to be respectful, I was wrong. Just say it ;) Perhaps it would > be more accurate to that that if CDs were mastered like DVD-Audio or > SACDs, they may sound just as good (or at least we'd finally be able to > prove one way or the other!) > > I think that regarding the general theme, however, we're in agreement. > Someone who prefers vinyl may actually be preferring quality mastering. > Nothing about vinyl is inherently better.
Well, I would think that one could argue that vinyl is inherently better in that analog reproduction is not limited to 44,100 samples per second. At a high enough sampling rate though, the argument falls apart, since there must be some sampling rate that is beyond human auditory perception (even through golden ears). -- jeffmeh ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jeffmeh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3986 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34379 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
