DCtoDaylight;209892 Wrote: 
> It's probably even more complicated than simply moving the re-sampling
> into slimserver.  You know as soon as you did that some idiot (like
> me!) would be complaining that when I sync my Transporter to my SB3, I
> only get a 48K rate on the Transporter.  Then I'd complain, why can't
> you sync two different sample rates so I don't hear echo's as I move
> around the house!  
> 
> I can certainly understand Sean's frustration!  As well as
> understanding why some companies like to obselete older gear asap. 
> Thankfully Slim isn't following that business plan...
> 
> As for the benefits of 96K, it's not that any of us could ever hear
> much beyond 20KHz, or that we really want to please any passing bats,
> it's trying to remove the effects of the anti-aliasing filters from the
> audible high end.  There's lots of argument over this topic, but you
> probably can hear 11KHz, and that's only an octave lower than the
> corner frequency of the anti-aliasing filter for a CD sampling rate. 
> That's also into the range where directional perception is working. 
> The difference is subtle, and requires a good system and good source
> material to hear, but I'm convinced it is real.  
> 
> As always, your mileage may vary!
> Dave

Can't you downsample in SlimServer already by device?

If you can transcode from anything to anything I don't see why it would
be hard to downsample.

And after reading other posts it sounds like you can transcode per
device (even by MAC address).


-- 
mswlogo

Thinkpad XP SS > Cat5 > SB3 > SPDIF-COAX > Meridian 861V4 (Trifield,
Room corrected, Upsampled) > DSP5500 Mains, DSP5500HC Center, DSP33
Rears
------------------------------------------------------------------------
mswlogo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9090
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36240

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to