opaqueice;214115 Wrote: > You seem to be missing a rather basic point. 2007 science has > demonstrated that two identical stimuli, reproduced several times, can > and will produce very different perceptions in the same person. So > just the contrary, 2007 science predicts that you WILL hear differences > even when they're not there - and you do. I've never understood why > people have so much trouble with that concept. > > > > > We do know why, at least more or less. It doesn't have to do with > cables or amplifiers or digital sources, which are much much much > closer to perfect than anything else in the audio chain. It does have > to do with the fact that it's a recording made with localized mics of a > non-localized source, played back in stereo in a room very different > from the recording venue through very imperfect speakers. All of that > measurably and verifiably heavily distorts the sound - there's > absolutely no need to resort to any exotic explanations.
No - precisely the opposite. If you make a recording in a live venue, then play back that recording: 1: At the same venue 2: Through the same sound system 3: Through the same speakers There will be a clear difference. Of course there will be. Anyone can pick that up. -- amey01 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ amey01's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11274 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36503 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
