Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't part of the attraction to 96K upsampling to reduce the brick wall effect of filtering at or near 44.1 kHz? And thus by doing so, better / smoother filtering occurs? With less aliasing, quantization noise, etc.?
Now, unlike the most of you, I'm NOT a computer guy. Nor did I stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night, so I may be missing the boat here. I can tell you, however, I recently added a SRC Behringer 2496 to the digital stream before my DAC and, at 24/96 upsampling, I like what I hear. Also, what's the mathematical magic to upsampling to 88kHz vs. 96kHz. Are bits really that OCD? -- Videodrome Two-channel System: SB3, into Musiland MD-10 DAC; Outlaw 970 Pre/Pro; McCormack DNA-125 amplifier; Quad 11L speakers; Sota Sapphire ttbl. w/ Grado Ref. Platinum Cart. into Rolls Bellari VP-129 tube phono stage; Marantz 10b; Nakamichi RX505; Cables Used: DH Labs, Van den Hul, Distech, Monster, many more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videodrome's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11727 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36986 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
