ezkcdude;224267 Wrote: > Phil, I wasn't aiming my post at you. My point was simply that I would > prefer to argue about subjects that can be objectively measured, or at > least, ways to develop or improve objective measurements. Debating > whether one guy's "sweet high-end" is better than another guys' > "defined mid-range" (to me, anyway) is pointless. Who gives a flying > fig? Now, what would be interesting to me is to come up with some > *objective* measurements that could demonstrate these types of > differences. I know - it's the holy grail of audiophilia, and to my > knowledge hasn't been achieved, and maybe never will, simply due to the > complex neural and behavioral (psychoacoustic) components involved. > However, it would please me greatly, immensely, if we were somehow > discussing these technical aspects. I think we'd all learn a bit more - > if people were willing to *listen* - yes, to the music - but also to > each other. I also think some of the folks here could probably be > getting a PhD with all the time spent arguing these matters on forums. > And yes, I already have a PhD in something entirely different, so I'm > afraid it's not going to be me that takes up this monumental task. :)
I know! - and I totally agree! My supply of flying figs ran out ages ago. I wish this forum had a different name... -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... ...SB3+TACT+Altmann+MF DACXV3/Linn tri-amped Aktiv 5.1 system and some very expensive cables ;o) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=38041 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
