inguz;227308 Wrote: > Tony - the difference between your two seems just to be low-frequency > (<10Hz) noise. The current ImpulsePrep procedure doesn't filter out > noise much below the sweep-start frequency, so that dominates (-40dB) > versus the HF noise over long time intervals. > > Most of the interesting action in the impulse response is within the > first 10 or 20 milliseconds. Then up to 400ms or so you can see room > reverberation. After that (unless you have a really resonant room), > pretty much everything's noise. > > Some similar charts of my own setup: with a bit of extra LF filtering > http://inguzaudio.com/img/uncorrected_impulseenvelope.jpg > > and various other charts incl the DRC/Octave output (but no narrative > yet): http://inguzaudio.com/img/
Okay. I guess I understand that, but what's not clear to me is how the two curves match up to what you wrote here. The light is not going on in my head. :-) -- tonyptony ------------------------------------------------------------------------ tonyptony's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3397 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35615 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles