inguz;227308 Wrote: 
> Tony - the difference between your two seems just to be low-frequency
> (<10Hz) noise.  The current ImpulsePrep procedure doesn't filter out
> noise much below the sweep-start frequency, so that dominates (-40dB)
> versus the HF noise over long time intervals.
> 
> Most of the interesting action in the impulse response is within the
> first 10 or 20 milliseconds.  Then up to 400ms or so you can see room
> reverberation.  After that (unless you have a really resonant room),
> pretty much everything's noise.
> 
> Some similar charts of my own setup: with a bit of extra LF filtering
> http://inguzaudio.com/img/uncorrected_impulseenvelope.jpg
> 
> and various other charts incl the DRC/Octave output (but no narrative
> yet):  http://inguzaudio.com/img/

Okay. I guess I understand that, but what's not clear to me is how the
two curves match up to what you wrote here. The light is not going on
in my head. :-)


-- 
tonyptony
------------------------------------------------------------------------
tonyptony's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3397
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35615

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to