opaqueice;236345 Wrote: > None of the results in that paper are even close to significant, as far > as I can see from a glance at it. My initial impression upon reading that sentence was that you did not consider the tests as having showed anything. I am sure that is not what you intended people to think. I would go so far as to say that the results are *very* significant, in that they demonstrate that the (small but measurable) effects were not audible.
The postscript about the "golden ears" failure in a blind test was not really part of the test proper, but I found it amusing nonetheless. -- cliveb Transporter -> ATC SCM100A ------------------------------------------------------------------------ cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=39093 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
