seanadams;253647 Wrote: 
> OK good... next thing to test is to try listening to Transporter's
> _analog_ outputs while it is being fed by the 48KHz word clock. They
> should operate both in 44.1 and in 48KHz mode. Then if you disconnect
> the word clock while playing, the analog outputs should either go
> silent or speed way up or down.

The Transporter, when using the internal DAC, works just fine. It
produces analogue output for 44.1, 48 and 96 (which I have tried) and
sounds good.

seanadams;253647 Wrote: 
> Also, try playing both 44.1 and 48 KHz tracks while in 48KHz mode. The
> 44.1 tracks should sound sped-up.

Yes, when I used a dCS Delius as external clock to Transporter this
works as well. Indeed, the 44.1 sounds speed up. I also tried to run 96
like this. And then of course slows down. Notice, I still use the
analogue outputs.

seanadams;253647 Wrote: 
> ?!? Why? 
> 
> Such a configuration should only be used if you have some requirement
> to synchronize multiple _source_ components, perhaps for editing
> purposes.
> 
> It is the MCLK (eg 11.2896MHZ) signal that actually drives the internal
> operation of a modern DAC chip, and the whole point of word clocking
> (for the purpose of reducing jitter) is to put that clock as close as
> possible to the DAC chip itself.
> 
> A PLL is absolutely _terrible_ at generating a master clock from a word
> clock, compared to generating it directly with a crystal. But that is
> not even the only source of jitter - you are also accumulating it in
> all the connections between this equipment, and in the clock source
> device itself, as it has to divide a crystal-generated clock internally
> to produce that low word clock frequency.

Well, I use a system where the dCS Paginini clock is used to syncronize
the Transporter and a dCS Paganini DAC. The DAC receives S/PDIF data
from the Transporter and does not need to decode the clock from the
data - as is also the situation in master mode.


seanadams;253647 Wrote: 
> I am not aware of any situation where a word clock would be advisable
> for driving a DAC.  You will get jitter much worse than anything you'd
> get even from traditional s/pdif master->slave clocking.... i.e. this
> is not only defeating the jitter eliminating mechanism of the word
> clock interface, but is actually making the jitter far worse even than
> plain s/pdif. You are probably running your DAC on a few hundred
> picoseconds of jitter, as opposed to the 30ps or less that would come
> from a good quality internal oscillator.

1) You may use a DAC in master mode to feed clock to the Transporter. I
used to do this with a dCS Delius, and have tried the same with the dCS
Paganini DAC.

2) Even better is to syncronize both the DAC and the Transporter to an
external clock - if this clock is of higher precision than the one in
the DAC.


seanadams;253647 Wrote: 
> That's fine... but driving the DAC from a word clock signal is not OK.
> The problem could in fact be that the jitter is so high that the system
> is on the borderline of being able to operate at all.

Sorry, your statement is wrong - at least as I see this issue and as I
understand your statement. I use a dCS Paganini clock that syncronizes
a dCS Paganini DAC and the Transporter.

seanadams;253647 Wrote: 
> Have you tried hooking things up in the usual word clock configuration
> where the DAC (not a separate box) is the clock master?

Yes, with a dCS Delius - 44.1 works but 48kHz does not work. The dCS
Paganini works well at 44.1 but does not output 48 so this I can not
try (that's why I have the Paganini clock - which outputs also 48).

seanadams;253647 Wrote: 
> Also, have you talked to dcs about this issue? I'm not just trying to
> point fingers here, but without having the equipment on-hand this is
> very hard for me to diagnose. They may be able to provide some
> additional insight here.

I have the user's manual of my dCS units and they explain the issue in
details.

Further, I have tried to contact the support at slimdevices - may be I
did not succeed to post it properly(?) - and they haven't provided any
technical answer yet.

Rgds.


-- 
achri-d
------------------------------------------------------------------------
achri-d's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10325
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=39770

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to