deltasierra;350044 Wrote: 
> I'm still using EAC.  db is nice and I like it, but am one of those
> dinosaurs that still only keeps/uses WAVs, so a lot of the extensions
> of db beyond EAC are useless.  
> 
> Lossless or not, I've decided for about the 20th time not to move to
> FLAC.  Diskspace is cheap and long file names work OK.  However, that
> means transporter prettiness is out for me.  Metadata is overrated in
> the opinion of this audiophile.
> 
> EAC is wonderfully easy to use after you've ripped a ton of your
> collection.Yes if you don't use metadata then it's way overated. :)


-- 
Nonreality

-IF THE RULE YOU FOLLOWED BROUGHT YOU TO THIS, OF WHAT USE IS THE RULE.-

HTTP://www.last.fm/user/nonreality
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonreality's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15723
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53344

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to