JezA;377233 Wrote: > I don't have any difficulty understanding you at all. But my conclusion > might be that the (extremely expensive) Tact is unacceptably sensitive > to jitter, especially as it claims not to be. So the difference that > the O/P hears, if it due to the cause you hypothesize, reveals at least > as much about the inadequacy of the Tact as it does about the inadequacy > of the Nakamichi or the superiority of served music. Incidentally, you > don't have any proof whatsoever, other than backwards reasoning, that > the Nakamichi produces more jitter than the SB, you are just supposing > it to be so. Removing the Tact from both chains, and listening again, > would reveal useful information.
I have to agree with JezA here - if the TacT is audibly sensitive to moderate levels of input jitter, it's poorly designed (especially given its price point). Phil, whatever happened to those distorted square waves it was making? -- opaqueice ------------------------------------------------------------------------ opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=57173 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
