JezA wrote: > So why do people bother recording at 24bit/192khz? And why do people > like Gimell sell versions of their music at 24/48 and 24/96? Overkill? > Waste of money? Or have they got equipment and ears that can resolve > the difference?
Nearly all modern studio equipment can record at 24/96 or 24/192. Its trivial to do. And if it sells better, they win. More practically, when you record at high/wide specs, and then do mixdown, effects, etc. then you have less loss. JezA still strikes me as a troll -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
