Phil Leigh;379085 Wrote: > Below Nyquist there are no "gaps" between the samples that are "missing > information" and which would be magically filled-in with a higher > sampling rate.
One thing I never understood. While that is theoretically true, it is also true that for various reasons no real world device will ever be able to reconstruct the wave in the sense of the theorem. It is not even computable. So back in the real world, is it not possible that by carefully filling some of the gaps with cleverly calculated samples this could result in an improved reconstructed wave? -- bhaagensen ------------------------------------------------------------------------ bhaagensen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7418 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=57631 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
