Hi Folks, Just reviewed this whole thread and I think it could benefit from some Paraphrasing.
It started of by someone (Louis) saying that he converted his book (16/48), to a digital format, WORD (wav) doc but then if he emailed them as pdf (flac), they didnt read the same, he prefered the story as a WORD document as the PDF didnt have the breadth or depth of storyline. But Interestingly by magnifying (upscaling) the book (16/44.1)to higher resolution (24/ 48khz), he read more words than the author had written in the original version and prefered the story with the additional script. Other people then chipped in by saying that by running a spellchecker (ADM)there was no difference with the story in word or pdf format. Other people then said in with how important Font (jitter) was and that of the font was bad then it made the words harder to discern. Other people then thought that there was a possability of Babelfish or google translate kicking in (poor transcription in the squeezebox) and that it was much better to do this on a higher power pc. It has also been suggested that the ability to read and understand the story depended on your physiological state at the time and that this could affect your enjoyment of the story especially if you were predisposed to thinking that a Word document is the truer version. I would especially grateful if someone could pharaphrase a conclusion -- c3p0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ c3p0's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=20721 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=71321 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
