ncarver;582230 Wrote: > And to my knowledge no one has ever conducted a blind test of cables > where negative results meant anything beyond that test. I would be > very interested for you to provide citations for a set of serious tests > that have been done with cables so that I could evaluate their validity. >
To find a set of serious tests, you'd first have to find a serious researcher that believes they're worth doing. That's going to be quite difficult. > So I am not going to just take your word for it that there have been > "numerous tests" that "scientifically prove" what you claim. Conventionally, putting " " marks around something indicates you're quoting a passage. Can you please point out precisely where I said there had been "numerous tests" that "scientifically prove" something? And if you can't, please don't fabricate quotes that I didn't say. OK? > If there are so many that support your position on this that you feel > this is a scientifically proven fact then you ought to be able to > provide me with a list of half a dozen or so of such tests, where > detailed descriptions of the protocols are available, and I would of > course expect that some would have been published in peer reviewed > journals. I think it might be difficult to find a peer-reviewed journal that would accept such a paper (see above for the reason). > > Obviously I like my yellow jacketed cable today because it is a sunny > day. :) Bingo - that's exactly the straw man. Thanks for the example. -- opaqueice ------------------------------------------------------------------------ opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=82067 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
