magiccarpetride;585432 Wrote: > Regardless of the causes and reasons governing those differences, when > you get your hands on a hi-rez master, you will hear that familiar tune > in a different light, offering you a different quality, a different > experience, maybe even an epiphany. You may or may not prefer it to the > standard version, but the differences are undeniable (as you and Phil > had just corroborated).
That's not what Phil and Robin corroborated - you don't seem to have understood their posts. The most relevant one is this: Phil Leigh;58541 Wrote: > > If you downsample the 24/96 file to 16/44.1, it still sounds better > that then the Verve master and *indistinguishable from the 24/96 > version.* In other words, at least as far as Phil is concerned there is no benefit to listening to a 24/96 version of the Chesky remaster. A redbook (16/44.1) version sounds just as good. -- opaqueice ------------------------------------------------------------------------ opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=82870 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
