Phil Leigh;585517 Wrote: > Interesting point. The 24/96 does have frequencies up to 40K at > potentially audible levels (-80dB) but I suspect these are artefacts of > the DSD conversion process - .
So analog to DSD then to 24/96 ? Master pedigree hmm . Is not DSD 20 bit something in resolution SACD except for in the highest treble where artifacts can creep in at higher level than 16/44, but thats SACD . Maybe studio DSD is better ? But I read somewhere (sorry no source quote) that what is required for the human hearing is 20bit 55kHz so 16/44.1 is less and 24/88.2/96 is more . Studios should produce in far higher res than required for playback is not most software used working in 32bit floating piont math or better ? Is this a mfsl release :-) I do like getz gilberto sometimes. I'm a bit DSD sceptic seems like SONY "we want another propriotary format to licence" and labels are happy as they can not be ripped and home pc users can not use easily usedsd anyway :-/ ? The "arguments" for dsd looks friegthenly similar to audiphile lore ? -- Mnyb -------------------------------------------------------------------- Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH and assorted amps SiriuS, Classe' Primare and Dynadio speakers, Contour 4 Contour Center, and Contour 1.3SE rear ch. Rel Stadium 3 sub. Bedroom/Office: Boom Kitchen: SB3 + powered Fostex PM0.4 Misc use: Radio (with battery) PLEASE FIX BUG 112 http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=112 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=82870 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
