earwaxer9;620060 Wrote: > I have been enjoying my 24/96 now for some time. Either native or > upsampled. I find it to be much more enjoyable than the 16/44.1. > Richer, more realistic. Not sure what can be credited. The sample rate > or the frequency. I suspect the frequency has a larger role, although I > havent tested it. I think the Transporter "architecture" has something > to do with that also. > > Of course I'm going to be curious about the 192khz realm! Thats the > duty of the audiophile. Always looking for the next "upgrade". I do > have some sanity though. I'm not distraught, although, I cant sample it > with the Transporter - it tops out at 96khz. Dont get me wrong - I'm > happy were I'm at. Just trolling. Hi earwaxer9, Are you comparing the same music files but down-sampled properly to 16/44.1? If not, the difference may be due to mastering.
Regards, Darren -- darrenyeats http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/richpub/listmania/byauthor/A3H57URKQB8AQO/ref=cm_pdp_content_listmania/203-7606506-5721503. SB3, SB Touch SqueezeControl for Android ------------------------------------------------------------------------ darrenyeats's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10799 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=86510 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
