NoRoDa;680419 Wrote: > I made the decision to convert in SBT due to the fact that I want to > keep my 176Hz and 192Hz as they are. If not, I would have to convert > them to 96Hz. > > I believe they guys enjoying the 45 and 50 enjoy it due to tha fact it > sounds sweet and they are able to crank the volume up way high without > the sound getting hard.
I tried that, but the reduction in resolution made me limit to 24/96 wav files served to sbt as pcm. from what I have read people can't really hear any difference between 96 and above and also most electronics are tuned for 96 hz. Also think you are missing quite a bit of audio quality by having sbt convert the flac/wav to pcm. dbpoweramp reference is quite cheap. although I try to buy 24/96 over anything above. cheers -- SBGK ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
