AlexM;689501 Wrote: 
> The question is how low jitter has to be before it is inaudible.
Indeed it is. If the jitter is already beneath the threshold of
audibility, reducing it further is a pointless exercise.

And guess what? In the two PROPERLY CONDUCTED trials of jitter
audibility I am aware of (Benjamin & Gannon: Theoretical and audible
effects of jitter on digital audio quality, 105th AES Convention, 1998;
and Ashihara, Kiryu et al: Detection threshold for distortions due to
jitter on digital audio, Acoust. Sci. & Tech. 26/1, 2005), it was shown
that really quite high levels of jitter are inaudible on music signals.
Benjamin & Gannon found jitter inaudible below 20nS, while Ashihara
found it inaudble below 250nS.

The point about these trials is that the only thing that changed was
the jitter itself. Isolating this as the only variable is critical if
you expect to be able to draw any conclusions as to the effects of
jitter.

So: CAN WE PLEASE STOP TREATING JITTER AS SOME SORT OF BOGEYMAN? There
are other reasons why different bit-identical data streams may sound
different through the same DAC:

1. Expectation bias on the part of the listener. This is probably the
real reason in >90% of cases.

2. Noise (electrical and/or airborn) emitted by various components
interfering with the analogue stages of other system components. And
the complexity of this is huge - it depends on the components
themselves, their relative placement, even the influence of nearby
metallic objects such as equipment stands. This is a classic example of
a complex system, impenetrable by reductionist analysis. Any effects
noted in one system will have little or no relevance in another system.


-- 
cliveb

Transporter -> ATC SCM100A
------------------------------------------------------------------------
cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to