Soundman;691032 Wrote: > I described the procedure further up in this thread: > http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?p=688560#post688560 > The five of us "played" four rounds of ten tests, with a different > operator for each round. This amounts to 160 single tests, which > resulted in 153 correct answers (no one erred more than once in each > round). Before passing the test we agreed that the balance of correct > answers must be at least 9:1. > To run the tests a friend brought his unmodded Touch and a DAC with two > coaxial inputs (because my amp only has one digital coax-input). That > way we did not need to rewire after every test and the op could simply > switch the buttons. I must say that is impressive. So despite the fact that outputs were randomised so that it could be AAABB or ABBBA or ABABB or whatever, you got it right 153 times out of 160? by my calcuation the chances of getting 153 or more correct out of 160 by random chance is 1.1102230246251565e-16 which means that it is 99.99999999999999 % unlikely that this is random chance
As a matter of interest what was the question each person was answering? -- adamdea ------------------------------------------------------------------------ adamdea's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37603 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
