Soulkeeper;693482 Wrote: > No, because what you say isn't impossible. Unlike the claims made about > bit-perfect file copies sounding worse than the original. Extraordinary > claims require extraordinary evidence. The audiofool claims are > extraordinary and without evidence.
Of course my post was mainly in jest--perhaps you missed the smiley? I thought a sorbothane mouse pad a poor choice to poke fun at audio tweeks, since it might actually perform very well for mechanical mice, and pads/surfaces can absolutely affect performance of mice. Just to clarify, are you saying that it is so clearly impossible for two bit-identical copies of an audio/video file stored on a computer to play differently on that computer, that absolutely no effort needs to be wasted to refute such a claim, and those making the claim are fools? -- ncarver ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ncarver's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15905 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93549 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
