aubuti wrote: > Thanks, and I personally don't find that surprising. But I really was > looking for some of the purported "well documented cases where > sufficiently large population of double blind testers were reporting > significant differences", which I also interpreted (perhaps foolishly) > the 'significant differences' to be the statistically-relevant kind.
I quoted the wrong person. my mistake. i just wanted to point out my own examples of how easily people are fooled you wont find anything statistically relevant. ever. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ TheOctavist's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52700 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=94418 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
