totoro wrote: > I at least pointed out what some issues with your post were. Your reply > was exactly nothing but a rather pathetic attempt at a chest thump. I > personally love k+ h speakers, which are active. My next pair will be > gedlee abbies though. > > It's fairly clear that you are either unable or unwilling to have an > intelligent conversation about the technical merits of active > crossovers, which is an interesting topic (and is in any event somewhat > off topic, but is just about the only intelligible subject I can extract > out of your last blurts of rhetorical diarrhea), or what problems people > in general may have with expectation biases. My guess is unable due to > cognitive deficit and a severe case of Dunning Kruger syndrome.
I said which active speakers with active crossover are inferior, please elaborate. Now your statement is basically what "chest pump" you are referring to. I have a good ear, and I know a thing or two about music history and composition, although in electronic things related I let the techs speaks... Never said I was the king of the hill. When I am put down in such an insulting manner how would you react? I'm just saying that in passive crossover there is a big amount of distorsion and unless you resolve this with "magic" you are behind a veiled system to critically judge this mod. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ edodo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=55876 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=94770 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
