LarsHP wrote: > As I said - I am no computer engineer, but my statement was regarding > timing in the digital domain in general, not certain parts of the > digital domain. > > Thanks to both of you guys for your quick replies. > > Do you think a ReadyNAS Ultra 2 RNDU2000 will do a good job? > As I understand, the NAS should preferably be x86 compatible ...
The ultra seems a popular choice . Competitors would be vortexbox, HP proliant microserver . A shuttle or other barebones small PC, some higher end Synology modell . There are a bunch of plug computers and ARM based devices that are popular , if one will sacrifice some performance for the powersaving and can live without transcoding options . x86 or some of the latest arm devices . I think gary had the old ReadyNAS duo ,wich was very slow and had very little ram :-/ As I understand a NAS is more expensive than a barebones diy /vortexbox /microserver but offers other pre-installed features if you like som of the other features that a NAS vendor offers this may be your choice . If it's only for the squeezeboxserver you can get more bang for the buck elsewhere . ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=95276 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
