Wombat wrote: > ROFL! > > Something interesting. The second time i link to that side in a short > time :) > Seems this place has some very experienced and valuable listeners and > members while they developed some mercy for the metaphysical arguying > people. They just let them speak and give them a place. > http://www.computeraudiophile.com/content/513-jriver-mac-vs-jriver-windows-sound-quality-comparison/#comments > > It shows that Jriver does a 100% exactly job under Windows and Mac. To > my understanding there is no place for audible differences. Even 2 > comletely different USB cables are in this test and surprise, > surprise... > Now if someone claims that even a Kernal does change sound while > complete different OS´s don´t the person claiming this should really > think about giving up computing and buy some working stuff from the > shelf.
Nice link and well conducted tests. But any tests which do not validate the conclusions obtained by golden eared professional high end audio reviewers (aka clowns) are NOT VALID. So therefore JRiver used on a Mac with $500 USB cables always sounds better than JRiver used on a PC with $20 USB cables, otherwise who is going to buy advertising in their magazines. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98298
_______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
