ralphpnj wrote: 
> As I just responded to probedb, yes it was meant as a joke but it is
> really hard to make a joke about something that it is itself one big
> joke. While you and many other of my fellow forum members might
> instantly recognize the joke, unfortunately most audiophiles would not
> see anything wrong with my post and in fact would gladly believe it and
> spend money on 24 bit versions of modern recordings with minimal dynamic
> range.

I agree - and of course 32 bit floating point must be better than 24 bit
integer, as more is better...



"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=102391

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to