A nice aside to this whole discussion is the history of the audiophile
fixation with the USB interface for digital audio.

Several iterations ago of the Windows operating system it was discovered
that USB digital output on a Windows computer was not bit perfect due to
an issue with the sound driver. This issue was addressed both in several
completely free programs (e.g. Foobar2000) and in subsequent releases of
the Windows operating system. Another way to deal with it was to use a
Mac. However when using a Mac and iTunes it was discovered that when
listening to various music files with different sample rates iTunes did
not handle the different sample rates correctly, which by the way
Foobar2000 handles correctly as does both the Transporter and the Touch,
so the answer was to install an additional paid music player called
Amarra (http://www.sonicstudio.com/amarra/amarra_purchase_landing) which
has different versions varying in price and features from $30 to $650.
Of course any self respecting audiophile would only use the $650
version.

Now comparing the computer based audio playback on a Windows computer
versus a Mac (aka Apple) computer from an audiophile perspective we
get:

Windows computer (anywhere from $200 to $2000 and up) + Foobar2000 ($0)
+ either USB or optical or coax (many Windows motherboards have optical
or coax digital audio outputs) digital audio output + either a USB or
non-USB DAC

Mac/Apple computer ($500 and up) + iTunes ($0) + Amarra ($650) + USB
output + asynchronous USB DAC

So just based on the computer and software alone the Mac system costs
more and therefore must be better since in the audiophile belief system
whatever costs more is always better. And so we get to the present state
of affairs. Windows machines at one time did not have bit perfect
playback but that is no longer the case. Both the Transporter and Touch
have always offered bit perfect playback. By "bit perfect playback" I
specifically mean the ability of the digital outputs to transmit a bit
perfect digital audio stream to an external DAC. However in the case of
both the Transporter and the Touch the audiophile world has for some
strange reason deemed both of these devices as unworthy of high end
audio playback.

And so we have now have the only acceptable and audiophile approved
system for the playback of computer based audio consisting of the
following components:

A Mac Mini, Mac laptop or Mac desktop computer > iTunes with Amarra >
USB output > asynchronous USB DAC

One thing I find really funny is that while marching in lock step to
their belief system so many audiophiles have the nerve to call those of
us who dare to break ranks "close minded", but then turning of truth
into lies and lies into truth as always been a big part of the
audiophile belief system.



Living Rm: Transporter-SimAudio pre/power amps-Vandersteen 3A Sign. &
sub
Home Theater: Touch-Marantz HTR-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Linn sub
Computer Rm: Touch-Headroom Desktop w/DAC-Aragon amp-Energy Veritas 2.1
& Energy sub
Bedroom: Touch-HR Desktop w/DAC-Audio Refinement amp-Energy Veritas 2.0
Guest Rm: Duet-Sony soundbar
Garage: SB3-JVC compact system
Controls: iPeng; SB Controller; Moose & Muso
Server: SBS on dedicated windows 7 computer w/2 Drobos
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to