Julf wrote: > No, they are indeed pretty useless, just like home administered sighted > tests.Good, so you agree with the worthlesness of these tests done at home. You should really be shouting that from the rooftops as many here & elsewhere on audio forums ape DBT/ABX as the gold standard for what's audible & what isn't. They simply don't get it - perceptual testing is a very difficult area & requires expertise & very careful design/administration to do a proper test. As you & Garym both say - it's useless/worthless.
> So would you have any results of carefully controlled (according to the > ITU standards that you seem to have become fond of quoting since I > pointed them out to you) sighted listening tests that would support any > of the claims made in this thread that you could share with us?Did I first > learn of ITU from you? I doubt it - more likely JJ but I can't remember? Anyway, remind me what claims made on this thread need support? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103842 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
