Mnyb wrote: > So the typical oversampling DAC with a filter thats not your ca 1986 > brickwall filter does it roughly rigth ?
Indeed. > I not versed in the exact technical details . I'm certain that there is > some kind of group of good compromises that gets its done like the SoX > settings you use. Yes - I think that is the "way beyond more than good enough" point. > Hence the idea now that CPU power cost nought to do this stuff with > proper floating point math in software . Do we want to go there? I can already see it - "ah, but floating point is never totally precise, so there is always room for improvement" :) "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103537 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
