Mnyb wrote: 
> Are we not making things to complicated in these cases archimago shows
> with two methods that the output of the dac is the same hence no need
> for DBT or other complex measures. The same output is the same the tiny
> dissimiliarities that dont make the curves overlap exactly is the random
> noise . Two measurement of the same thing will be similar .
> 
> Except the one case with the broken 24/48 playback , there is certainly
> a difference . Based on prior knowledge the level of the anomaly is on
> to low to be heard , but in principle ? If one wants to be sure.
> 
> Dbt can also be good tool when testing unknown things or stuff that are
> really complex to measure hard to do at home , like speakers or
> headphones

Hi Mnyb. Yes, I agree :-). I think the tests speak for themselves in
capturing all I think can be captured in a way that would encompass what
we can hear... Differences beyond the core finding of the tests as far
as I can test would be inaudible.

Nonetheless, I do want to hear from folks like SBGK to make sure
verifiable claims are looked at. If claims are unverifiable; perhaps
better yet the beliefs  "unfalsifiable", then I think we can say clearly
we are not dealing with the scientific domain.

SBGK: here's a thought. Since you have developed the software over
years, maybe you can give us 2 versions. One that sounds 'good', and one
'bad' (early version? Poor compilation settings?). No messing around
with bitperfect of course. Surely with all the incremental improvements,
differences would be additive and at some point measurable, right?



Archimago's Musings: (archimago.blogspot.com) A 'more objective'
audiophile blog.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104136

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to