Archimago wrote: > Nonetheless, I do want to hear from folks like SBGK to make sure > verifiable claims are looked at. If claims are unverifiable; perhaps > better yet the beliefs "unfalsifiable", then I think we can say clearly > we are not dealing with the scientific domain.
Yes, that is a very under-appreciated part of science - the huge amount of tests, studies and measurements where we are already pretty sure that the results will be negative, but it still has to be done, so we can be sure. "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104136 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
