Ouch. Can't believe I missed that when I read the blog posting. Yes, Kunchur is simply wrong in the stuff about sample rates, and basically just shows a lack of understanding of Nyquist-Shannon. Archimago, please don't propagate his error.
Let's reiterate what Shannon-nyquist implies - as long as the sample rate is more than twice the highest frequency component in the input signal, the sampled signal can be reconstructed *perfectly* - not just in amplitude, but also timing. This of course assumes infinite precision - with limited resolution, you get the formula adamdea posted. "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104401 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
