utgg wrote: > Full paper is freely available here: http://www.aes.org/journal/
Note that unlike most AES papers, the download is at this time totally free. The meta study could be summarized as follows: One of the funnier aspects of the article can be found en by checking the footnotes. There are papers describing approaches to this problem going back to 1931, and still all the high res advocates like this author can come up with is a call for more experiments! Even with some pretty obvious cherry picking of results, the best the author could come up with is according to Table 2, a total of 12,645 trials with 6,736 or 53.27% correct responses. This is 3.27 % better than placebo. In most areas of human endeavor, people would call this sort of weak performance a lost cause. The call for more testing looks to me like a lame attempt to obfuscate the absence of compelling results after over a century of trying and over 10,000 trials, even after fairly obvious cherry-picking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105816 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
