drmatt wrote: > Much like the analogy in another thread of a picture in a book being the > same no matter how many times you open the book to look at it. > Irrelevant.
Yet someone made the claim that a file sounded different the second time it was read and didn't like it being called out and refuted based on easily verified facts It was subjective, you know, so it shouldn't have to stand up to scrutiny. Changes in the analogue domain may obviously alter the sound, but I much prefer claims that are based on some kind of objective analysis and lacking that at least a subjective judgement that stays moderately plausible. Dramatic changes due to a different power lead doesn't enter that realm, even subtle changes is a stretch. Any change done to a normally working digital transport on the other hand has to be intentionally degrading the fidelity of the signal (altering the content) to be audible, any products to improve digital transport or the proponents of said products can and should be dismissed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ alfista's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32396 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105775 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
