arnyk wrote: > You're making the logical mistake that just because a change was made, > your hobby horse unfounded assertions are validated. > > The actual reasons for the upgrade are widely publicized and well-known > and not what you say, Edward. > > http://www.cablinginstall.com/articles/2013/05/how-cat8-will-solve.html > > "What Category 8 copper cabling will do for the data center is let them > transport data four times faster on essentially the same type of cable > they now use, says Sterling Vaden, chair of TIA 42.7, the TIA > subcommittee on copper cabling systems. That makes great sense > application-wise and economically, because the intended data rate being > developed by IEEE is 40-Gb, 4 times faster than 10GBase-T, using the > same or less power per port, which has an unofficial target of less than > 2 Watts. > > So Edward, do we attribute this major discrepancy between your claims > and the actual facts to your ignorance of the true facts or a desire to > win the argument by means of deception?
Do you usually go though out your day being wrong so much? 1) High band width is not the ONLY reason but it is a major benefit. 2) Just because something was improved for reason "A" does not mean effects can not be seen elsewhere. Next!!! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ edwardthern's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=66099 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106593
_______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
