darrenyeats wrote: 
> The problem with this statistical angle is that a large number of
> samples is needed.

Hi Darren!

I'll have to take issue with you here. The whole point of doing
statistical analysis on data samples is that the samples do not need to
be particularly large to yield statistically significant results, and in
fact increasing sample size is of diminishing value compared to the
effort required to achieve it. Many sampling schemes use fixed sample
sizes to make predictions about underlying populations of considerably
variable size.

I haven't fully researched the statistical angle yet, but given that the
identification of "X" as "A" or "B" has a 50% individual chance of being
correct by chance I was thinking along the lines of a "Normal"
approximation to a binomial distribution to see how many standard
deviations (right or wrong) each listener's answers are from the
expected value which would be that you could expect to get half of your
answers right using ear defenders & a fair coin toss with "A" for heads
& "B" for tails, or vice versa.

Perhaps someone would help me out if I'm up a gum-tree with this
approach.

In any event, once the results have been collected, statistical analyses
of any kind can be applied later.

Dave :)


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Golden Earring's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=66646
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106914

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to