On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Ralf Wildenhues <ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hello, > > * NightStrike wrote on Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 05:09:04PM CEST: >> >>> Is this possible? Is there anyone willing to do it? >> >> >> >> Addendum: A big benefit for me (other than many other things) is that >> >> it lets automake handle figuring out dependencies. In my example, >> >> libx.a doesn't depend on x.def, and I don't know how to make it do so. >> >> >> > >> > Ping >> > >> >> x2 > > From me, the answer is no. There are lots of other things that are more > important to a presumably larger user base, that are more portably > usable in principle, and IIUC you can easily work around the current > limitation.
Well.. not nicely. It's kind of ugly, and doesn't do anything about dependency tracking. > If somebody else codes it, I might consider it, but even then it'd be > strictly lower priority than basically all other pending stuff I know > of, both with and without patches. Ouch :( > Sorry, > Ralf >