Oh - "peed off" doesn't come into it.

And thank you - if it does, you're a gent and I owe you a pint.

I still stand by my opinion of Google's tactics though.  :-)

Cheers,

Rich.

On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Ian Forrester <ian.forres...@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
> Wow Richard you sound ummmm, a little peed off?
>
> If I got any invites I'll make sure one goes your way.
>
> Secret[] Private[x] Public[]
>
> Ian Forrester
> Senior Backstage Producer, BBC R&D
> 01612444063 | 07711913293
> ian.forres...@bbc.co.uk
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-backst...@lists.bbc.co.uk 
> [mailto:owner-backst...@lists.bbc.co.uk] On Behalf Of Richard Lockwood
> Sent: 07 October 2009 18:12
> To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
> Subject: Re: [backstage] Google Wave
>
> As would I.  On one hand I'd like an invite, on the other I'd rather gouge my 
> eyes out than have one. The way Google pass their "invites"
> out is very clever-clever in building up a market, but it marks them out as 
> c***s.  I've worked with all kinds of Google stuff and been to various Google 
> conferences over the years but this time I don't get an "invite", whereas I 
> have friends who couldn't give the square root of
> f*** all about Google who've been "granted" an "invite".
>
> F**k 'em and the horse they rode in on.
>
> R.
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Dan Brickley <dan...@danbri.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Ian Forrester <ian.forres...@bbc.co.uk> 
>> wrote:
>>> Changing the long running threads (don't think I'm not watching)
>>>
>>> Now Google Wave invites are out there and more of you have had a
>>> chance to play with wave. What do people think? And why is no one
>>> building a decent client for it?
>>>
>>> Am I the only excited person?
>>
>> I think most everyone else is embarrassed to admit they'd quite like an 
>> invite.
>>
>> I'd quite like an invite.
>>
>> Main thing I'm positive about so far, is that XMPP deserves serious
>> attention and this will help it get some...
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> Dan
>> -
>> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,
>> please visit
>> http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
>> Unofficial list archive:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
>>
>
> -
> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
> visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
> Unofficial list archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
>
> -
> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
> visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
> Unofficial list archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
>

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

Reply via email to