>It might have been better to update the name of the libraries in 5.0.2, but it >by no means something that is absolutely necessary. As far as I am aware, as >long as all the daemons on a single machine are of the same version, there is >absolutely no problem.
Fair enough, I have an RH cluster to update so I thought I would update bacula as well and just looking for anything open. I'll apply the lib perm patch and leave it at that as there doesn't appear to be anything significant that affects my environment. Thanks for the reply Kern, jlc ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
