Thanks! On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 1:34 PM Christian Grün <[email protected]> wrote:
> I see! As XQuery sequences may contain items of arbitrary type, it is > not always possible to decide at compile time which Java function > needs to be chosen for evaluation. I recommend you to stick with the > "Object..." declaration. > > Nevertheless, I will check if we can optimize the static function > selection without compromising performance. > > Best, > Christian > > > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:30 PM Alexander Shpack <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi Christian, > > > > Right now we are using the next code > > > > public static String exec(String key) { > > return ... > > } > > > > public static String exec(Object... keys) { > > return ... > > } > > > > The code that doesn't work: > > > > public static String exec(String... keys) > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 10:51 AM Christian Grün < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Alex, > >> > >> How does the signature of the invoked Java function look like? > >> > >> Best, > >> Christian > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:43 PM Alexander Shpack <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > >> > Hey, team! > >> > > >> > Just simple question. How to pass sequence of string to the java > class? > >> > > >> > let $values := for $i in (1 to 3) return $i cast to xs:string > >> > return j:exec($values) > >> > > >> > In case when local function returns one item all is good. Otherwise > j:exec takes array of item()+, but not the array of stings. > >> > > >> > If you just call j:exec(("1","2")) than all works as expected. > >> > > >> > Any thoughts? Is it bug or feature? ;) > >> > > >> > BaseX 9.0 > >> > > >> > Thanks! > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > s0rr0w > > > > > > > > -- > > s0rr0w > -- s0rr0w
