You'd simply have to type in another command, e.g. "make-full" instead of "make".
Come on guys. ;) Am 13.11.2014 um 16:58 schrieb Vicente Carro: > As a non-devel user I'm against the idea for exactly the reasons Terry is > mentioning in his last email. It would be a hell for artists to set the > compilation options to have the last git version working. > > Regards, > Vicente > > On 13 November 2014 15:36, Dalai Felinto <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 to the proposed idea >> on top of that it would be nice to have a 'make release' or similar >> option to mimic the settings used in the release build. >> >> It's worthy noting that the current CMake default settings are already >> different than the release options (e.g., BlenderPlayer is not built >> by default). The idea presented here only brings this a step further. >> >> Regards, >> Dalai >> -- >> blendernetwork.org/dalai-felinto >> www.dalaifelinto.com >> >> >> 2014-11-13 13:14 GMT-02:00 AIBlender <[email protected]>: >>> On 13/11/14 14:32, Sergey Sharybin wrote: >>>> Addressing this: >> I understand the reasoning behind it Sergey, but if >> new >>>> people want to build Blender they should get something which is >> approaching >>>> a feature complete build, otherwise what is the point of using a Dev >> build. >>>> Why would motion tracker developer want to deal with LLVM? Why new >> modifier >>>> guy would want to deal with Boost? Why compositor or dependency graph >> guys >>>> need to worry about any of external dependencies? This could be >> continued.. >>>> For sure at some point developer would need to be able to compile >>>> feature-complete blender, but forcing him to solve all the dependencies >>>> from the very beginning is really scary for new developers. >>>> >>> If for every new dev you started turning off features because they get >>> confused you end up with a very limited version of Blender. >>> >>> Any dev working on advanced features should be able to compile full >>> versions of Blender, and that Ideally should be because a seasoned Dev >>> has made Blender work with all feature enabled out of the box. >>> >>> Errors when features are turned back on are going to get reported and >>> need fixing anyways, so may as well keep it working from the very >>> beginning with all features on. >>> >>> Anyways my point is clear on this, sorry if it come across as aggressive >>> but, turning off features is just hiding problems, and for people like >>> me it will just mean I turn the features back on a complain a lot more >>> forcefully if I get errors that run out of control because some feature >>> was disabled because of some "scared" dev. >>> >>> Terry Wallwork >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bf-committers mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> _______________________________________________ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >> > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
