> > One solution could be to decide the seeding based on AVERAGE points per tour, rather than total? > >Get's my vote.
>It doesn't get my vote. If it was the average of points against (tours taken place (that year)), (rather than points against (tours played in)) then teams would benefit from attending more events. This could also be used to effect with a team not attending an A-tour event, and where they should play at the next event attended. If their points gained over 2 tours is better than a teams average over 3 tours, perhaps thay should have a place..?! (possibly with a penalty-margin of 'x' points applied) Team 'A' gains 110 and 130, points over tours - Average 120pts. Team 'B' gains 200 points, then skips Tour 2 - Average 100pts. Team A, although finishing well below team B in T1 still get the place... (There's probably a whole host of reasons this wouldn't work, but it's my tuppence!) Jesus Steal 2 http://www.discoverdeath.co.uk/jesus_shaves.htm __________________________________________________ BritDisc mailing list BritDisc@near.me.uk http://zion.ranulf.net/mailman/listinfo/britdisc Staying informed - http://www.ukultimate.com/informed.asp
