On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 05:15:42AM -0800, Chris Keane wrote: > Thanks Greg. Would the appropriate approach to implement this be to > set up each mobile database with it's own set of uniquely named > syncs that just includes itself and the central database?
Yes. > Can each single table on the central database participate in > multiple syncs without problem? Yes > Do you think there would be much of a performance impact on the central > server if each table ended up with a few hundred extra > bucardo_kick_% triggers? Probably not a huge one, but those might not need to be there anyway: you can switch to a timed strategy which might be better considering that only a certain % of the syncs will actually be "active" at any given time. We could also look into combining all the triggerkicks into a single function. Right now it's more of a conveinence than anything - there is reason we couldn't have a single trigger fire off X number of notices rather than X triggers firing a single notice. Perhaps a TODO item. -- Greg Sabino Mullane [email protected] End Point Corporation PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bucardo-general mailing list [email protected] https://mail.endcrypt.com/mailman/listinfo/bucardo-general
